Area of Risk
|
Possible Mitigation Approaches
|
Providers not ready
|
Outreach. Survey/questionnaires. Develop contingency provider support
plans.
|
Payers not ready
|
Outreach. Survey/questionnaires.
|
Neutrality
|
Identify your metrics. Establish a Workgroup. Test your approaches
against your metrics.
|
Configuration (payer systems)
|
Utilize a coding specialist to review benefit and contract
configurations. Develop tools and methods to assist with configuration
changes.
|
Trading partner Readiness
|
Surveys. Establish a dedicated workgroup
|
Inter-dependencies with other systems and procedures
|
Hold regular meetings. Communication. Ideation of workarounds.
|
Missed areas
|
Survey end users. Require formal signoffs from business area leads.
|
Testing
|
Establish a dedicated team. Employ the use of stubs to enable early
end-to-end testing.
|
Payments
|
Payment Modeling. Encourage provider-payer collaboration
|
Vendor readiness
|
Surveys. Repeated follow-up. Collaborate with other users of the
vendor’s product(s) Lobby for commonly needed information!
|
Resource availability
|
Project plans. Measure hours. Hire resources that can be converted to
FTE after project. Leverage internal
SME’s.
|
Impacts from other projects
|
Attend project meetings. Read status
reports and meeting minutes.
Educate PM’s and SME’s of other projects as to the various forms of
ICD-10 impact. If possible, avoid
enhancements and changes involving ICD, DRG and diagnosis-related
information.
|
While some of the above risks may have greater or lesser
impact depending on whether you’re a provider or a payer, where you are in the
ICD-10 implementation and the size and nature of your organization, your
project should have a risk assessment and mitigation plan that includes these and other potential risks.
For more information on ICD-10, you may want to Follow me on Twitter.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.